Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: Twenty-four Thomist theses

Savinov, Rodion V.

doi:10.31857/S004287440002592-6

English

Home>Issue 12>Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses»

Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses»

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses»

Annotation

PII

S004287440002592-6-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Rodion V. Savinov Send message

Occupation: Senior Lecturer
Affiliation: Saint-Petersburg State Academy of Veterinary Medicine
Address: Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

111-118

Abstract

The article considers ne of the most Important Sources that influenced the Development of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses», promulgated on July 27, 1914, and became the Doctrinal Foundation of the Intellectual Culture of the Catholic Church until the Period of «Aggiornamento». The General Historical Conditions for the appearance of this Document are revealed, that caused its Publication. It is determined that the Version of Thomism that was presented in these Theses was more Stringent than the Tomism of Neo-Scholastics of the 18th –19th Centuries, the was formed of which was influenced by Other Trends of Medieval and Post-Medieval Thought. A General Overview of the Theses is proposed, and the Systematic Consctrustion of the Theses is emphasized, connected with the Design of Philosophy that was Characteristic to Neo-Scholasticism and included such Parts as Ontology, Cosmology, Psychology and Natural Theology. Some Features of the Theses are shown, in particular, their Sharpness against the Materialistic and Cartesian Understanding of Matter, an Axiomatic Affirmation about the Essential Independence of Thinking from Corporeality. The Article gives a Russian Translation of Twenty-Four Thomist Theses, and Commentary showing some Specific Features of the Content of this Text.

Keywords

Thomism, philosophy, theology, neo-scholastics, neo-Thomism, Catholicism, metaphysics

Received

20.12.2018

Date of publication

20.12.2018

Number of purchasers

Views

833

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Savinov R. Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses» // Voprosy filosofii. – 2018. – Issue 12 C. 111-118 . URL: https://vphil.jes.su/s004287440002592-6-1/. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002592-6
MLA	Savinov, Rodion V "Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses»." Voprosy filosofii. 12 (2018).:111-118. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002592-6
APA	Savinov R. (2018). Doctrinal Foundation of Neo-Thomism: «Twenty-four Thomist theses». Voprosy filosofii. no. 12, pp.111-118 DOI: 10.31857/S004287440002592-6

Additional services access

Additional services for the article

Services benefits

100 RUB / 1.0 SU


1

References

1. Acta Apostolicae Sedis (1914) Acta Apostolicae Sedis. Commentarium Officiale, An. VI, Vol. VI, Typis Polyglottis Vaticanis, Romae, рр. 383–386.

2. Garrigou-Lagrange, Réginald (2013) The Essence & Topicality of Thomism, Lulu.com, Morrisville, North Carolina, pp. 61–80.

3. Hugon, Édouard (1920–1922) “Les vingt-quatre thèses thomistes”, Revue thomiste, 25e année, 1920, p. 116 et sv.; 26e année, 1921, p. 276 et sv., p. 356 et sv.; 27e année, 1922, p. 42 et sv.

4. Boethius, De consolatione philosophiae and other Treatises, Russian Translation.

5. Gilson, Étienne (1948) L’être et l’essence, Russian Translation.

6. Hugon, Édouard (1920) “Les vingt-quatre thèses thomistes”, Revue thomiste, 25e année, 1920, p. 116 et sv.

7. Kiryanov, Dmitry V. (2009) Thomist philosophy of the 20th century. Aletheia, St Petersburg (in Russian).

8. McCool, Gerald A. (1996) Nineteenth-century Scholasticism: The Search for an Unitary Method, 2nd ed., Fordham University Press, New York.

9. McGinn, Bernard (2014) Thomas Aquinas's Summa theologiae: A Biography, Princeton University Press, Princeton–Oxford.

10. Perler, Dominik (2002) Theorien der Intentionalität im Mittelalter, Klostermann, Frankfurt am Main (Russian Translation 2016).

11. Perrier, Joseph Louis (1909) The Revival of Scholastic Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century, Colombia University Press, New York.

12. Shmonin, Dmitry V. (2009) “Regulae professoribus, or as the Jesuits taught philosophy”, Review of Russian Christian Academy for Humanities, Vol. 10, no. 4 (2009), pp. 84–99 (in Russian).

13. Vdovina, Galina V. (2016) “Species impressa: on the intentional forms in cognitive doctrines of postmedieval Scholasticism”, Philosophy Journal, Vol. 3 (2016), pp. 41–58 (in Russian).

14. Vdovina, Galina V. (2017) ‘Arguments for the Existence of God in Francisco Suarez’ Metaphysical Disputations’, St. Tikhon’s University Review. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious studies, Vol. 73 (2017), pp. 69–82 (in Russian).

15. Vdovina, Galina V., Shmonin, Dmitry V. (2010) ‘Life and Alive in the Treatises “On the Soul” of the XVII Century’, Review of Russian Christian Academy for Humanities, Vol. 11, no. 3 (2010), pp. 56–69 (in Russian).