What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will

Tulchinskii, Grigorii L.

doi:10.31857/S004287440001891-5

English

Home>Issue 12>What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will

What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will

Table of contents

Annotation Estimate Publication content

References Comments

What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will

Annotation

PII

S004287440001891-5-1

Publication type

Article

Status

Published

Authors

Grigorii L. Tulchinskii Send message

Occupation: Professor, St Petersburg State University; National Research University “Higher School of Economics” – St Petersburg, Russia; Researcher, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Affiliation:
St Petersburg State University
National Research University “Higher School of Economics” – St Petersburg
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University
Address: Russian Federation

Edition

Issue 12

Pages

131-140

Abstract

The Russian revolution is a process of ambiguous modernization (since the end of the 19th century), which is still not institutionally completed. The key moment was the events of 2017. Their result was the coming to power of the Bolshevik Party, the Civil War, the formation of the political regime, which gave the very traumatic modernization form for socium. To explain these events, we propose a P. Chaadayev paradox about the prospect of the victory of historically untenable socialism because of the untenable of its opponents. The "Chaadayev factor" content clarified with the help of the concepts of political will and N. Taleb’s "black swans". From this point of view, the society transition into a new state is a matter of a small number of uncompromising people, who are personally interested in the transition, involved in this process. Success comes in the case of simplification of problems and solutions in combination with the accentuated uncompromising minority and sufficient tolerance of the majority, when representatives of this majority have an asymmetry in their choice. The review results are beyond the scope of Russian experience and open up new opportunities for analyzing and solving problems of passionarity and tolerance. For example, if the reciprocity in tolerance conditions will violated, the society may lose immunity in relation to the willful intolerant minority.

Keywords

bourgeois revolution, Chaadayev, intolerance, modernization, nationalism, “passionarity”, political will, Russian revolution, Taleb, tolerance

Acknowledgment

The study was performed under the grant of the Russian Science Foundation (№18-18-00442) "Mechanisms of sense formation and textualization in social narrative and performative discurses and practices" at the E. Kant Baltic Federal University.

Received

20.12.2018

Date of publication

20.12.2018

Number of purchasers

Views

692

Readers community rating

0.0 (0 votes)

Cite Download pdf

GOST	Tulchinskii G. What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will // Voprosy filosofii. – 2018. – Issue 12 C. 131-140 . URL: https://vphil.jes.su/s004287440001891-5-1/. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001891-5
MLA	Tulchinskii, Grigorii L "What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will." Voprosy filosofii. 12 (2018).:131-140. DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001891-5
APA	Tulchinskii G. (2018). What Else Can the Russian Revolution Teach: the Pyotr Chaadayev Factor and the Political Will. Voprosy filosofii. no. 12, pp.131-140 DOI: 10.31857/S004287440001891-5

Additional services access

Additional services for the article

Services benefits

100 RUB / 1.0 SU


1

References

1. Gumilyov, Lev Ethnogenesis and Biosphere of the Earth (in Russian).

2. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas The Black Swan. The Impact of the Highly Improbable (Russian Translation 2009).

3. Taleb, Nassim Nicholas Antifragile: Things That Gain from Disorder (Russian Translation 2016).

4. Chaadayev, Pyotr (1991) Fragments et pensées diverses (Russian Translation).

5. Belolipetskii, Eugenii V., Tulchinskii Grigoriy L. (2017) ‘Political Will: the Content of the Concept’, Political reflection, theory and methodology of scientific research. Yearbook of the RAPN 2017, ed. Alexandre Soloviev, Politicheskaja Enciklopedia, Moscow, pp. 187–211 (in Russian).

6. Burnham, James (1941) The Managerial Revolution: What is Happening in the World, The John Day Company, New York.

7. Galbraith, John K. (1967) The New Industrial State, The James Madison Library in American Politics (Russian Translation 2004).

8. Lebedev, Alexandre A. (1965) Chaadayev, Molodaja Gvardija, Moscow (in Russian).

9. Miller, Alexey I. (2016) Nation or Power of Myth, EU St Petersburg, St Petersburg (in Russian).

10. Stoljarov, Andrej I. (2015) The Reverse Perspective, LitSovet, Moscow.

11. Tarasov, Boris N. (1986) Chaadayev, Molodaja Gvardija, Moscow (in Russian).

12. Tulchinskii, Grigoriy L. (2015) Russian Political Culture: Features and Prospects, Aleteja, St Petersburg (in Russian).

13. Tulchinskii, Grigoriy L. (2017a) ‘Bourgeois Revolution in Russia – when and why’, Revolution in National and World History: to 100 Anniversary of Russian 1917 Revolutions, SUTD, St Petersburg, pp. 394–397 (in Russian).

14. Tulchinskii, Grigoriy L. (2017b) ‘Understanding of Russian Inverstions: from A. Acheser to C. Hedlund’, Leontiev’s Readings, St Petersburg (in Russian).

15. Voslenskii, Mikhail S. (1991) Nomenclature, Politizdat, Moscow (in Russian).