Post-nonclassical Science and Philosophical and Mystical Worldview
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Post-nonclassical Science and Philosophical and Mystical Worldview
Annotation
PII
S004287440001341-0-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Natalia S. Zhirtueva 
Affiliation: Institute of Social Sciences and International Relations, Sevastopol State University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
77-85
Abstract

 

The comparative analysis of main ideas of mystical teachings and modern post-nonclassical science is realized in the article. Modern post-nonclassical science has come to the conclusions that resonate with mystical worldview. Being exists as Integrity according to the principle of “all in every part”. Integrity is understood as the unique property of unity of the world (holism). Being develops in the relationship of stability and instability, linear and nonlinear, order and chaos. There are gaming and creative moments in the development of the Universe. Consciousness is a nonlinear system, which requires the self-regulation mechanisms for its development. Consciousness develops on the principle of complication. It is designed to fight chaos (entropy) on the scale of the Universe.

 

 

 

Keywords
mysticism, scientific paraligm, post-nonclassical science, Absolute, holism, integrity, synergetics, psychopractice.
Received
03.10.2018
Date of publication
03.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
933
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article

Publication text not found

References

1. Akimushkin, Oleg F. (2002) “The Sufi brotherhoods: the complex knot of problems”, J.S. Trimingham, The Sufi Orders in Islam, Sofia, Helios, Moscow, pp. 3–22. (In Russian).

2. Alexander, Denis R. (2007) “Models for Relations Science and Religion”, Faraday Paper, Vol. 3 (2007), pp. 1–4. https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Papers.php

3. Brushlinsky, Andrey V. (1982) “Thinking as a Process and the Problem of Activity”, Voprosy Psikhologii, Vol. 2 (1982), pp. 28–40. (In Russian).

4. Ellwood, Ronert S. (1980) Mysticism and Religion, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

5. Gleik, James (1987). Chaos: Making a New Sceince, Viking Book, New York (Russian Translation 2001).

6. Kapra, Fritjof (1975) The Tao of Physics, Shambala Publications of Berkley California (Russian Translation 1994).

7. Kimelev, Yurii А. (1985) Modern Bourgeois Philosophical and Religious Anthropology, Mysl’, Moscow (in Russian).

8. Klimkov, Oleg S. (2000) “Man in the worldview of hesychasts”, Verbum, Vol. 3 (2000), pp. 199-208 (In Russian).

9. Knyazeva, Helena N. (2016) “Return to unity: the methodological aspects of evolutionary holism”, Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy Sociology And Political Science, Vol. 3 (2016), pp. 23–35 (In Russian).

10. Kolokol, Vadim A. (2016) “Related to some aspects of the interdisciplinary paradigm of research”, Philosophical Horizons, Scientific and Theoretical Journal, Vol. 35, pp. 121–129 (In Russian).

11. Kravtsov, Mihail A. (1994) “Qabalistic essay and comments”, Shimon R., Fragments from the book «Zohar», Gnosis, Moscow, pp. 255–324 (In Russian).

12. Maslow, Abraham H. (1970) Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York (Russian Translation 1999).

13. Polikarpov, Vitaliy S. (1990) Science and Mysticism in the XX century, Mysl’, Moscow (In Russian).

14. Polkinghorne, John (2007) “The Science and Religion Debat – an Introduction”, Faraday Paper, Vol. 1 (2007). https://www.faraday.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk/Papers.php

15. Razumnyi, Yrii T. (2013) Basis of design, NGU, Dnepropetrovsk (In Russian).

16. Shtanko, Valentina I. (2002) Philosophy and Methodology of Science, KNURE, Kharkov (In Russian). Stace, Walter T. (1961) Mysticism and Philosophy, Macmillan, London.

17. Stcherbatsky, Theodor I. (1988) “The Conception of Buddhist Nirvana”, Stcherbatsky, Th. I., Selected Works on Buddhism, Nauka, Moscow (In Russian).

18. Talbot, Michael (1996) The Holographic Universe, Harper Collins Publishers, London.

19. Zhirtueva, Natalia S. (2015) “Typology of World Mystic Traditions and Methods of Phychopractice”, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 9 (2015), pp. 201–210 (In Russian).

20. Zhirtueva, Natalia S. (2017) “Creativity in the Mystical Traditions of the World”, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 9 (2017), pp. 141–150 (In Russian).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate