Religion, Atheism and Science: Interpreting Interactions and Heuristic Opportunities (Historic, Philosophical and Pantheoretical Aspects)
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
Religion, Atheism and Science: Interpreting Interactions and Heuristic Opportunities (Historic, Philosophical and Pantheoretical Aspects)
Annotation
PII
S004287440001340-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Dmitry Gusev 
Affiliation: Moscow State Pedagogical University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Pages
65-76
Abstract

Everlasting controversy between religious and atheist worldviews is breaking out again at the current post-secular stage of Russian society. The contest of religious and atheist values is tightly connected with present-day political, social and cultural contradictions and conflicts. Which are the possible position and role of science here that mainly determines the image of the present-day world? 

 The author suggests one of the possible variants of analyzing relations, interactions and heuristic opportunities of religion, atheism and science as forms of social consciousness. Whether science is close to atheism by its nature and is it really opposing to religion as it is often viewed? What are the grounds of scientific and atheist worldviews being made close? Whether science can be not only an ally of atheism but organic continuation of religious ideas as well? How do scientific and anti-scientific social and cultural orientations correlate with religious and atheist worldviews? Whether atheism can be characterized as a more rational worldview compared to religious one? How can religious irrationalism be quite rational whereas atheistic rationalism akin, at first view, to science appears to be a fundamental logic contradiction? 

The presented article attempts to look at these matters from a new angle, to find possible answers and make clearer complicated problems of interaction of religion, atheism and science in humanity’s spiritual culture. 

Keywords
religion, atheism, deism, theism, science, knowledge, faith, truth, natural world, supernatural world, Occam’s razor, verification, falsification, scientism, anti-scientism.
Received
03.10.2018
Date of publication
03.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
767
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
Additional services access
Additional services for the article

Publication text not found

References

1. Grigoriev, Vladimir I., Myakishev, Gennadiy Ya. (1988) Forces in Nature, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

2. Gusev, Dmitry A. (2015) “Skepticism as a Philosophical Realism”, Filosofija i kul'tura, No. 1 (2015), pp. 20– 28 (in Russian).

3. Gusev, Dmitry A., Potaturov, Vasiliy A. (2017) “Discussion about Theological Education in the Context of Clericalism in Modern Russian Society”, Politika i obshhestvo, No. 4 (145), pp. 155–165 (in Russian).

4. Guseinov, Abdusalam A. (2010) “Philosophy between science and religion”, Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 8 (2010), pp. 4–10 (in Russian).

5. Krzevov, Vladimir S. (2012) “Religion in Modern Russia: Spiritual Revival or Clericalization of Society?”, Filosofskie nauki, Vol. 10 (2012), pp. 93–105 (in Russian).

6. Semenov, Vadim S. (2006) “Science and Religion: the Relationship, Confrontation, Perspectives”, Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 6. (2006), pp. 73–88 (in Russian).

7. Tsyplakov, Dmitiy A. (2015). “Post-secular Society in Russia and Education”, Gumanizacija obrazovanija, No. 3 (2015), pp. 8–14 (in Russian).

8. Tsyplakov, Dmitiy A. (2016) “Theological Education in Post-secular Russia”, Idei i idealy, Vol. 2, No. 1 (27), pp. 3–13 (in Russian).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate